Proposal Preparation Guidelines

Principal Investigators (PI) must notify the Office of Research and Economic Development (ORED) before submitting an external grant application or proposal in order to obtain permission to do so via the Pre-Award Clearance Routing Process. PIs will work with their assigned Pre-Award Specialist to obtain permission. Pre-award Specialists are assigned to specific colleges and administrative units within the university.

To access forms, please go to Forms and Templates.

If a PI would like to access the faculty grant writing manual, entitled “New Faculty Guide to Competing for Research Funding,” please look for it on the Grant Development BeachBoard. The manual is available only to employees of the university. Contact ORED at ORSP@csulb.edu for access to the Grant Development BeachBoard.

• Step 1: Identify your college’s assigned Pre-Award Specialist
• Step 2: Cayuse SP Proposal:
  • Create and complete a Cayuse SP Proposal at a min of 14 Days prior to proposal Deadline
  • Upload internal documents: in the “Proposal Attachments” section of Cayuse SP, upload the following documents: Budget Spreadsheet, Budget Justification, FCOI (Key personnel), Internal Approvals (Cost Match/F&A), Sub-award documents (if applicable), and any other misc., documents requested by ORED.
• Step 3: Contact Pre-Award: 
  • Once the Cayuse proposal is completed, email the assigned Pre-Award Specialist to inform them that the Cayuse SP proposal is ready for review. In the Subject section of the email, provide the assigned Cayuse SP proposal number.  
• Step 4: Pre-Award Review: 
  • Pre-Award Specialist will work with Lead PI/PD to finalize all the required internal clearance documents.
  • Once all internal documents are finalized, the Pre-Award Specialist, with the approval of the lead PI/PD, will initiate the Routing. 
• Step 5: Proposal Submission: 
  • Upon completion of the Routing, the Pre-Award Specialist will work with the lead PI/PD to prepare and submit the proposal to the funding agency. Note: on a case by case bases, the Pre-Award Specialist may at times simultaneously work on the proposal submission process while working on the internal clearance process, however, per ORSP procedure, a proposal cannot be submitted to the funding agency until the internal Clearance process (Routing) has been completed.

Budget Requirements

To access forms, please go to Forms and Templates.

• PIs must access the latest version of the budget-related documents from the ORED website; do not use templates from previous grant submissions since they will not include the latest revisions. This will reduce the time spent on updating budgets to adhere to current requirements.
• There are two versions of the budget spreadsheet available. A majority of grant submissions will not include cost/share match; therefore, only use the budget spreadsheet with cost/share match when it is required.
• The budget spreadsheet and budget justification form must conform to the sponsor’s guidelines and correspond to each other.
• PI's shall observe the guidelines when developing budgets for Fixed Priced Contracts.
• Budgets shall be sufficiently accurate so revisions can be avoided after Clearance Routing is completed; however, when necessary, changes can be made before a grant application is submitted. A secondary Clearance Routing is only required when there is a change of at least 20% more or less of the total budget AND there is no change to the scope of work.

More information about developing NIH Modular Budgets

Modular grant applications are not to exceed $250,000 in total direct costs per year. Unsolicited, investigator-initiated applications requesting more than $250,000 in any year and applications for grant activities not specified above will be required to follow traditional application instructions and applicable NIH policies.

Salary Information Resources

Percent of Time and Effort to Person Months Conversion Chart (PDF)

CSULB Requirement: PI must dedicate at least 1% or .01 months to the project budget otherwise proposal will bear voluntary committed cost sharing which is not allowed under CSULB policy unless approved by the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs.

Fringe Benefit Information

Budgeting for Fringe Benefits (PDF)

Facilities & Administrative Costs (F&A)

Federal F&A Rate Agreement

• Administrative Costs Charging on Federal Grants Policy and Procedure
• DHHS Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Rate Agreement (PDF)

University F&A Practices and Procedures

• Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Policy
• Facilities and Administrative (F&A) Policy Amendment
• Guidelines for Determining F&A rate: Contains definitions and classifications
• F&A Indirect Return Calculation Formula (PDF)
• F&A Cost Return Distribution (PDF)

Indirect Cost on Agreements from the State of California – Effective January 1, 2016

The CSU and UC have established a base rate of 25% beginning January 1, 2016 – increasing over a 5½ year period to 40% of the Modified Total Direct Costs (as defined in our federally-negotiated rate agreements) for the recovery of facilities and administrative (F&A) costs for State of California funded agreements. However, if a campus is a sub-recipient of federal funds and the State agency is a pass-through entity, as defined in 2 CFR 200.93 and 2 CFR 200.74, respectively, then the campus should budget and receive their federally negotiated rate for the project as specified by 2 CFR 200.331(a)(4). If the federal program has a capped F&A rate in compliance with 2 CFR 200, then the campus may accept the capped rate in compliance with their own campus policies.

Rate Schedule for F&A Recovery for State of California Agreements

The rate in effect for the first year of a multi-year project will be the rate used for the entire project period in proposed and awarded budgets. If additional funds (not previously appropriated or budgeted) are awarded by a State agency; the proposed budget for these additional funds would use the rate in effect at the time the new budget request is submitted.

Acceptance of a rate lower than 25% requires system office approval. The Chancellor’s Office SPO will coordinate with the UCOP Research Policy Analysis and Coordination (RPAC) office on any IDC rates accepted at lower than 25% to ensure that both systems are in agreement when or if a lower rate would be appropriate.

Many funding agencies require cost sharing by the recipient institution. Cost sharing refers to the portion of the project or program cost that is not reimbursed by the sponsor. It may be required by the sponsor as a condition of the award (mandatory) or it may be offered by the California State University, Long Beach (University) in excess of mandatory cost sharing requirements (voluntary). Whether cost sharing is required by the sponsor or is offered by the University or Project Director voluntarily, once an award is made all cost sharing commitments are considered to be mandatory, and as such represent binding obligations of the University and California State University, Long Beach Research Foundation (Foundation).

Cost Sharing is defined as costs that are incurred to support a sponsored project that are not reimbursed by the sponsor. There are two types of cost sharing mandatory and voluntary.

Mandatory: Cost sharing refers to cost sharing that is required by a sponsored grant or contract in writing.

Voluntary: Cost sharing that is not explicitly required by such an agreement. Voluntary cost sharing is further divided into two categories committed and uncommitted.

• Voluntary committed cost sharing: refers to cost sharing that is not explicitly required by the sponsor, but is committed to the sponsor by the recipient in the proposal and/or budget.
• Voluntary uncommitted cost sharing: is defined as effort that is over and above that which is committed and budgeted for in a sponsored agreement.

Important: Cost Share/Match is not allowed unless stated as a requirement on the solicitation (proof from Sponsor is required) and approved by corresponding college and the AVP for Research. Please see Cost Share/Match Policy.

CSULB Requirement: PI must dedicate at least 1% or .01 months to the project budget otherwise proposal will bear voluntary committed cost sharing which is not allowed under CSULB policy unless approved by the AVP for Research.

ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1887 - PROHIBITION ON STATE-FUNDED AND STATE-SPONSORED TRAVEL TO STATES WITH DISCRIMINATORY LAWS

From the Office of the Attorney General:

In AB 1887, the California Legislature determined that "California must take action to avoid supporting or financing discrimination against lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people." (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (a)(5).) To that end, AB 1887 prohibits a state agency, department, board, or commission from requiring any state employees, officers, or members to travel to a state that, after June 26, 2015, has enacted a law that (1) has the effect of voiding or repealing existing state or local protections against discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression; (2) authorizes or requires discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression; or (3) creates an exemption to antidiscrimination laws in order to permit discrimination against same-sex couples or their families or on the basis of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subds. (b)(1), (2).) In addition, the law prohibits California from approving a request for state-funded or state-sponsored travel to such a state. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (b)(2).)

The travel prohibition applies to state agencies, departments, boards, authorities, and commissions, including an agency, department, board, authority, or commission of the University of California, the Board of Regents of the University of California, and the California State University. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (b).)

The law also requires the Attorney General to develop, maintain, and post on his Internet Web site a current list of states that are subject to the travel ban. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (e).)

States Subject to AB 1887’s Travel Prohibition

The following states are currently subject to California’s ban on state-funded and state-sponsored travel:

1. Alabama
2. Arkansas
3. Florida
4. Idaho
5. Indiana
6. Iowa
7. Kansas
8. Kentucky
9. Mississippi
10. Montana
11. North Carolina
12. North Dakota
13. Ohio
14. Oklahoma
15. South Carolina
16. South Dakota
17. Tennessee
18. Texas
19. Utah
20. West Virginia

To view the list of exceptions the Legislature created in AB 1887 that allow travel to banned states in certain circumstances. (Gov. Code, § 11139.8, subd. (c).), please visit the Office of the Attorney General website.